Saturday, June 07, 2008

Jack Kirby's O.M.A.C.: One Man Army Corps Review

Recently reviewed by me at CBR: Jack Kirby's O.M.A.C.: One Man Army Corps, about which I write the following sentences: "With 'The Demon,' and 'Mister Miracle' at an end, and the success of his post-apocalyptic 'Kamandi' series, Kirby was nudged toward another futuristic concept. He'd had an idea for a 'Captain America in the future' comic at Marvel a few years earlier, but he decided against it. So take one part future-Cap, one part Kamandi, 98 parts Kirby genius, and mix them in a super-space blender, and -- presto! -- 'O.M.A.C.: One Man Army Corps.'"

Read the entire review HERE.

Friday, June 06, 2008

Recommended Summer Reading 2008 Hits THE SPLASH PAGE

Chad Nevett and I can get caught up in the weekly comic book grind all to often. We feel the need to comment on what's "fresh," and rarely get time to discuss some of our favorite older comics or collected editions. So we decided to spend this week talking about what we would recommend this summer--what collected editions should you buy and read over the coming months, and why? That's the question, and we give plenty of answers.

Get your wallets ready, because this installment of the internet's hottest non-gossip column will make you want to spend some heavy duty cash this summer. Read all about it in the newest Splash Page.

Or, as always, you can click HERE.

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Secret Invasion #3 Review

Recently reviewed by me at CBR: Secret Invasion #3, about which I write the following sentences: "The final page of this issue is perfect -- it encapsulates everything that Bendis has been building toward since he began thinking about this series. I won't give it away, but it's what we've been waiting for, and just like the Hawkeye-being-Hawkeye again scene from issue #1, it's a great geek moment. Of course, if you haven't been reading all of the other Bendis comics, you might be confused about who all those other characters are. But I'm sure Bendis will explain everything, or direct you to the three dozen spin-off titles that will."

Read the entire review HERE.

Invincible Iron Man #2 Review

Recently reviewed by me at CBR: Invincible Iron Man #2, about which I write the following sentences: "Fraction plays Stark as the ultimate multi-tasker. He's that super-tech geek who needs to be the first one with the new toys, if he doesn't have the new toys, he needs to know about them before you do and pass them by because they're already obsolete. He's the guy that plays the role of the hero, and shoulders the burdens of the world, but acts like it's all a breeze -- partly because he's prepared for it, and partly because he's concerned about what's next and just whizzes through the incidents that would make the average hero tremble. He also allows himself to have fun doing it, and when he battles with M.O.D.O.G. (that's Mental Organism Designed Only for Genocide), it's like a cat batting around a mouse that doesn't yet know it's dead."

Read the entire review HERE.


Wednesday, June 04, 2008

The Superman 2000 Pitch: The Writing Process

I've commented a bit on the Morrison/Waid/Millar/Peyer concept for Superman 2000, the famously rejected pitch that might have revitalized the Superman franchise for a new millenium, and Chad Nevett has looked at what the pitch had to say about Superman's dietary habits and morality, and today I'll take a look at what the guys had to say about how exactly they would all team up to write Superman. How would that have worked, anyway?

According to the final section of the pitch, titled "The Writing Process":
Project: Superman 2000 includes a new and different approach to the very way the comics are created.

The four of us would like to pool our talents in a unique way. We’re less interested in seeing each Super-book assigned to one writer as we are in putting everyone’s individual talents to their best use every week. Morrison and Millar are headmen, full of new and refreshing ideas; Peyer and Waid write from the heart with an emphasis on dialogue and characterization. No more round-robin scripting where some guy’s always stuck writing Chapter Three; instead, scenes and scripts fly back and forth across the Great Pond, and instead of duplicating past dynamics where good writers are introduced into the Superman Collective and then sometimes forced to subsume their individual styles and visions, the adventures of Superman are chronicled by a group of like-minded scribes who were friends before they were partners, who know they share a common vision, who are willing and eager to work as a unit for the good of their own hero.

It's a whole new way of writing comics, but it's not without precedent. In broad strokes, it’s similar to the way in which soap operas are crafted. Different writers are responsible for certain characters, plots and subplots, all according to their particular passions and specialties. We're still ironing out the details of the actual process, and we're all aware that any editor's heart would freeze solid at the sound of the names Morrison, Millar and Peyer in connection with anything that requires, oh, a weekly deadline...but since Waid meets his deadlines with an almost Catholic-guilt ferocity, he’s volunteering to be the Rob Petrie of this little Alan Brady Show--the writer who'll filter all the work and make dead certain it's on the editor’s desk when it's supposed to be. As much as he values his professional reputation, he’s willing to stake it on this thrilling and potentially revolutionary process. In the end, we know we can come through with stories the readers will be as excited to see as we will.

Hmmm...what a strange and revolutionary notion--a team of comic top-notch comic writers working in unison (sharing each issue by crafting subplots and character beats, and taking advantage of what they each do best) to create what would have been, in essence, a weekly comic. Not surprisingly, when this same writing process was actually tried, half a decade later, with DC's 52, both Morrison and Waid were involved. (Millar was at Marvel by then, and Peyer was pretty much out of comics at that point.) And I think it worked quite well on 52. Far, far better than whatever writing model was used for Countdown (supposedly Paul Dini as head writer an a rotating cast of writers on sequential issues, but I'm not exactly sure that's how it really happened--there seemed to be a lot of editorial influence on the nature of the series--far more than we saw in 52).

It will be interesting to see if Busiek and company can pull of a successful weekly series with Trinity, a comic which is scheduled to hit shelves today. One would think that a weekly series would be incredibly difficult to pull off, but not because of the writing. The drawing is the slow part. The writing should, in theory, take less time. But it doesn't work that way, does it? Everything is always harder than you think it will be, and when Morrison and company proposed collaboration on a weekly Superman series, they had no idea what they were in for. Ask Morrison or Waid if they'd ever do what they did on 52 again, and see what they say (note: it's not happy thoughts about ever doing anything of the sort, ever again).

Omega the Unknown #9 Review

Recently reviewed by me at CBR: Omega the Unknown #9, about which I write the following sentence: "It's just a regular sink, but its prominence grounds the strange, supernatural, space-operatic occurrences in this comic, and since every page contains something equivalent to the sink (a fire hydrant here, a cracked sidewalk there, an unmade bed, window treatments) 'Omega the Unknown' becomes about characters moving through a banal world which just happens to be filled with weirdness."

Read the entire review of this excellent, surreal comic HERE.

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Brief Reviews for 5/28/08 Comics

A quick look at some comics I read over the past week:

ACTION COMICS #865:
The Toyman: a sensitive portrait of a sad, misguided man. I liked this little breather from the more epic stories Johns has been telling. This is one of those "here's a slice of life from a villain your probably don't care about" stories that he did in Flash every year or two. It's a story that makes the Toyman sympathetic, interesting, and more consistent: Johns reconciles all the different versions of the character in this story and explains why so many different-looking "Toymen" have appeared over the decades (including the "Legion of Doom," jester incarnation). A good example of a done-in-one story, far better than either the recent Superman fill-in issue or the recent Toyman arc in Superman Confidential. ***1/2

ALL STAR SUPERMAN #11: I'm planning on writing something lengthy after issue #12, but I will say that this is the best DC series of the past few years. Someone in the comments over at Comics Should Be Good actually said that they prefer Tony Daniel's art to Frank Quitely's. Then someone else agreed. That's just crazy talk, isn't it? ****1/2

BLUE BEETLE #27: Will Pfeifer comes in to pinch hit and the story is sweet and cute and nice and I liked it. I read this one aloud to my son, and he thinks Blue Beetle is the best regular comic on the shelves. He loves the tone of this comic. ***

DAREDEVIL #107: I much prefer Brubaker's Daredevil to Bendis's. Bendis's version had more of a unique style, and I appreciate his formal experimentation, but it just seemed to repeat itself again and again and fail to move forward dramatically. Brubaker is telling more of a serialized story, maybe not as effectively as in Captain America, but a good one nonetheless--yet I'm still not exactly sure where this story is headed. I don't mind that at all, but I can't see the superstructure Brubaker has planned, and maybe that's why I don't love it. Is that a weird reason not to love it? ***1/2

GREEN LANTERN #31: As I mentioned in a comment to a previous post, I went out and bought all of the Johns Green Lantern hardcovers, because I think this might be my favorite in-continuity superhero series right now. Ivan Reis is amazing, and Johns has taken an origin story that I didn't need and made it into something that will be the definitive look at Hal Jordan's first year. This is Johns's best work, and I look forward to every issue. ****

HUNTRESS YEAR ONE #2 (OF 6): Less impressive than the debut issue, and I think I may bail out after issue #3 (which comes out this week, I think! That's fast!) unless the story takes a more interesting turn. Ivory Madison writes smart dialogue, but it's really just a bunch of mafia family stuff and I'm not too interested, really. I like this interpretation of the Huntress, but not enough to keep buying the book. **

IMMORTAL IRON FIST #15: I thought this was the worst issue of the series so far, but it's still a good comic. The other issues have just been outstanding, and this is merely slightly good. I'm not a big Khari Evans fan, but the art's fine. The story's fine. It just lacks the spark I've seen in previous issues, or maybe I didn't give it as much of my attention as I ought to have. ***

KING SIZE HULK #1: Probably not worth buying just for the Art Adams story, but, man, I bought it just for the Art Adams story. And Wendigo! Who can pass that up? Art Adams's Wendigo looks like a emaciated giant white werewolf, by the way, while Herb Trimpe's version (as seen in the reprint material--which included the first appearance of Wolverine! I bet you've never read that story before, since it's only been reprinted, oh, everywhere) looks like a schlub who just got punched in the nose. Does anyone else ever buy these giant-size or king-size issues and find the reprint material impossible to read? I can read the reprint stuff on its own, or in a Masterworks edition, but when it's paired with something new, I can't get into the tempo of the old stuff. I just hit a wall when I get to the reprints, and even if I want to read them, I find myself unable to pay as much attention as I should because I just read a much more quickly paced story at the beginning of the comic. New comics teach ADD. **1/2

LEGION OF SUPER HEROES #42: Supposedly Shooter's on the book for at least a year, and even though he might be leaving at the end of "Legion of Three Worlds," he should be able to finish this story arc by then, maybe. This thing is kind of dragging, isn't it? What exactly has happened since Shooter took over? I like the revitalized team energy, and I like the new costumes (finally introduced this issue) I guess. They're fine, but I don't buy comics for the costumes. I buy comics because I like to read stories where crazy stuff happens and it makes me all tingly inside. Shooter's not giving me much of that, yet. But I'm still hoping it will come. **1/2

NEW AVENGERS #41: This issue explicitly ties the very first, seemingly incomplete New Avengers story arc into "Secret Invasion" via Ka-Zar! Of, course it's Ka-Zar! (And Shanna.) Who else would be hanging out in the Savage Land and witnessing the whole story from behind the palm fronds. Ka-Zar has seen the whole business go down. He knows what the Skrulls have been up to. Why didn't he contact anyone? He thought they might be Skrulls! This was my favorite "Secret Invasion" tie-in yet, just because it was so straightforward and slapsticky. Shanna in disguise as an incompetent SHIELD agent? Spider-Man, completely baffled by what he thinks he knows? Good stuff! Compared to the Maleev-drawn, self-serious, constipated issues of late, I thought this was a refreshing, fun comic. And I like that New Avengers has actually been telling a really long story since issue #1, and few people have really noticed the little clues Bendis has been putting in along the way. An interesting counterpoint to Morrison's work on Batman. ***1/2

NORTHLANDERS #6: Another solid issue of my second-favorite Vertigo series. I really wanted to wait for the trade on this, but I'm glad I didn't (I lost patience after skipping issues two and three--I couldn't wait any longer and had to go to the shop and buy them). This is a very good series, and Brian Wood's themes are resonant and his characters are engaging. Even when they're bastards. Especially when they're bastards. I mean, they're vikings! ***1/2

POWER PACK DAY ONE #3 (OF 4): This is such a perfect kids' comic. Clear, stylish art. Funny bits. Cute bits. Fred Van Lente. Evil reptile alien babies. My two kids like it and so do I. ***1/2

TEEN TITANS #59: So the Terror Titans tie into the Dark Side Club, do they? And it's all some Final Crisis crossover, is it? It feels a bit forced, like Sean McKeever was asked to tie his plot into the summer's event after it had already been planned out. I don't know if that's how it happened, but that's how it feels. Which isn't a good thing. But I do think this comic is back on track after a year of mediocre stories. It's certainly better than either the JLA or JSA books on a regular basis now that McKeever has taken charge. Plus, any comic with Deathbolt, Jr. gets bonus points from me. I'd be a charter member of the Deathbolt fan club, if such a ridiculous thing were to exist. What a fancy costume the whole Deathbolt family has. ***

THOR #9: I'm still not on the JMS wavelength. I think he does some nice character work, and I like what he's doing to contrast gods and mortals and play the whole thing with this reverential irreverence, but the pace is soooo slooooow I can't help but feel like this series is not worth the time and money. Really, what has happened so far in this series? Thor has come back and so have a bunch of Asgardians, and.... that's it. If this is the end of Act I, then when is the climax of this story going to take place: issue #50? See Bendis, Brubaker, and Morrison for examples of long stories that can have stuff happen along the way. This, not so much. The art is very nice, at least. **1/2

ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN #122: Spider-Man vs. the Shocker! The eternal cat and mouse struggle of a chained up man with the proportionate speed and strength of a spider and another man with a gun that can shock real good. This comic shows why Bendis is a quality comic book writer. He can take a simple plot, and simplistic characters, and wring all the drama possible out of the situation. It's good. This series is good. And Immonen's art? Good. Very good. ***1/2

UNCANNY X-MEN #498: If Captain America is Brubaker's best mainstream work, and Daredevil is his average, but still good, work, then what is UXM? Not so good. This issue bounces back and forth between the Russian Red Room stuff with Colossus/Wolverine and the San Francisco hippy stuff with Cyclops and Emma Frost, but what the hell? This comic is treading water, and it has felt that way even when it was flying into outer space to punch Shi'ar guys with Final Fantasy VII swords. Waiting for the Fraction injection, stat. *1/2

YOUNG AVENGERS PRESENTS #5: The long-awaited Stature spotlight issue. Is Stature not the worst name ever, by the way? It sounds like one of those mock-Image names from Doom Force Special. If you haven't read this Young Avengers Presents issue, here's what your missing: Stature, Scott Lang's daughter has shrunken down to teeny tiny size and everyone tries to cheer her up. It's not a bad comic. It's just not as good as that time Ant-Man and Hawkeye teamed up to fight Taskmaster. But what is? And why would I hold any mere comic to that high standard? Because that's probably the only Scott Lang story I remember, except the one where Bendis made him explode. No wonder Stature has self-esteem issues. She also makes really bad casserole. Not here, but in that Ant-Man/Hawkeye story, when she was like 12. **1/2

Monday, June 02, 2008

"Batman R.I.P." Part II: Batman #677 Annotations

People seemed to like my annotations on Batman #676, and who am I not to pander to readers? So here are my page-by-page thoughts on Batman #677:

Page 1: I like that this issue begins with a single word, "Who?" That's the big question of Morrison's whole run on this series, isn't it? Who is behind all of this? Who is the Black Glove? Who hired Tony Daniel? (sorry, it was just too easy and I couldn't resisit.)

Pages 2-3: Batman's line, "...you ever see a Gotham hood dressed like this?" referring to the guy with the rag-tag Halloween costume, complete with sneakers and a demon mask--that's a bit curious isn't it? Aren't Gotham's hoods often dressed almost exactly like this? Doesn't Gotham have hundreds of costumed characters, many of whom dress their minions up in rag-tag Halloween costumes? This isn't the Golden Age Gotham City, when it was just a bunch of gangsters in suits.

The "old movie" Commissioner Gordon refers to is The Black Glove, of course, the John Mayhew film Batman describes on the following page. But there is a real-life "Black Glove" film, at least it was called that in America. In the U.K. it was released as Face the Music, a 1954 film directed by Terence Fisher, known for his lurid Hammer horror films. Here's the IMDB summary of the Fisher flick: "Brad Bradley (Alex Nicol) is a famous trumpet player who is suspected of murdering a blues singer. Using only two minor clues, he narrows the suspects down to four people, after surviving some fights and having poison placed on the mouthpiece of his trumpet." A murder mystery. But it doesn't look at have any other connection to this comic. But surely Morrison is familiar with the work of Terence Fisher.

Page 4: Is that supposed to be the movie poster for The Black Glove film? Didn't it appear in the "Club of Heroes" arc and look a bit more professional? This one looks like it was drawn and lettered by a child. A clue! The Black Glove is Damian! Probably not, as it's just another example of the rushed artwork by Tony Daniel on this particular issue. For another example of the rushed and problematic art, look at the final panel on this page when Alfred comments upon a wound he cannot actually seen according to the way it's drawn here. As I mentioned in my review for this issue, when the comic is a mystery, and visual clues are important, you really need to have an artist who gets it right. Is Alfred's awareness of the wound a clue? How can he possibly see it from that angle? I think it's just inaccurate drawings.

Also on this page, we get the plot of the DC Universe version of The Black Glove movie: "It's the story of two innocent lovers corrupted and destroyed by a group of super-rich gamblers." That parallels the Jezebel Jet/Bruce Wayne romance, and the corruption from outside, although clearly Jezebel and Bruce are anything but innocent.

Page 5: "This thing goes back years and involves people my parents knew," says Batman. This issue is full of such references, although Morrison hasn't mentioned much about the previous generation of Waynes in earlier issues. But perhaps this Black Glove stuff isn't even about Batman. Maybe Bruce Wayne is just the target because of something his parents were involved in years ago. That would be an interesting reversal. So often in recent Batman stories, he's fighting against monsters he has created himself, and sure, he might turn out to be the Black Glove and it might be some kind of multiple personality thing, but what if it's not. What if it's a bunch of things set in motion before he even donned the cape and cowl. That would make it more like a Greek tragedy, then, wouldn't it. Unstoppable force of fate and all that.

Also, Batman says, regarding his relationship with Damian, "That's not what I wanted to happen." Really? Because you brought the kid home and just let him hang out for a while. Is Batman so emotionally obtuse as to not imagine the effect on Tim Drake? Apparently so, and Morrison seems to be exploring Batman's emotional issues--his inability to process normal human emotions, perhaps. After all, he refers to his girlfriend by her last name. Batman, a cold, professional lover.

Page 6: To tie the "super-rich gamblers" of Mayhew's film even more closely to the events of this issue, we see a roulette wheel at the start of this page as the Club of Villains plans their attack. Dr. Hurt claims that the Club has two motivations: "to teach our upstart idealist a lesson," and to do it "as a work of art." These are cliche, evil-villain things to say, but the "teach a lesson" bit implies something patronizing, which strengthens the connection between the villains and the older Wayne generation. And the "work of art" bit is classic Morrison--he frequently connects "evil" schemes to art, as in the rogue Thanagarian "chaos artist" in Animal Man or the Brotherhood of Dada from Doom Patrol.

Page 7: Hurt refers to Batman as "our boy" and says "no one knows him better than I do." Is Dr. Hurt a resurrected (or never dead) Thomas Wayne? That makes no sense, but he does act as if he's an evil father figure, surely. The trigger phrase Hurt refers to is "Zur-En-Arrh" the homeworld of the alien Batman from issue #113. For more on Dr. Hurt and the strange sleep deprivation experiment, see my commentary on Batman #673.

Pages 8-9: I like how Tony Daniel shows Batman sneering when he's got the cowl on--even when he's with his girlfriend on a "romantic getaway" to the batcave--and he only allows Batman's face to soften when he takes the cowl off. I've given Daniel a lot of flak for his work in this issue, but at least the facial expressions come across in these two pages. I also like Batman's comment that "Alfred and I used to huddle around a PC covered in bat droppings." I've seen some criticism of Morrison's dialogue in recent months, and I don't understand that at all. Yes, Morrison is an idea guy, a structure guy, but his dialogue is as good as anyone working today.

Pages 10-11: "Ed Sheldrake" might be a subtle allusion to Rupert Sheldrake, biologist, who Morrison would surely have been familiar with. Rupert Sheldrake is one of the main proponents of the "morphogenic field" a notion which Morrison explored with Buddy Baker's powers in Animal Man.

There's a lot of information on this page that explicitly states things readers have suspected, particularly the notion of Bruce Wayne's schizophrenia. And the connection between Alfred and the Black Glove conspiracy. The scandalous details of Thomas and Martha Wayne's life is new to me--does anyone know of any prior stories implying their secret history?--and the notion that Thomas Wayne may have faked his own death is straight out of any soap opera, but I would be shocked if Morrison actually pulled it off.

Pages 12-13: I like the implied danger of the first panel, as the assault on Wayne mansion begins without Batman's knowledge, while inside he tours through his own fetish objects--his history as a costumed character--on display in the batcave. Jezebel Jet asks the question everyone asks about Batman, "what if you're not well?" When she refers to "those sad, blood-spattered little super hero costumes," it's hearbreaking on more than one level (and it's yet another example of Morrison's ability to write effective bits of dialogue).

Page 14: This splash page, with the bat-gyros and batcopters looming overhead, makes Bruce Wayne seem to be at the bottom of an ocean, with sharks swimming above him. It's a nice visual metaphor for what Batman's going through right now.

Pages 15-17: Morrison loves patterns, and so does Batman. Detective work is, after all, figuring out the patterns in the appearance of randomness. His reference to DC Universe #0, the scene with Joker's incomplete "dead man's hand" shows how integral that scene was to Morrison's overall story--I hope those pages are included in the "Batman R.I.P" collection. Or maybe not integral, but relevant. And the decoded message? "Ha Ha." Perfect.

I like how Batman goes on and on about "numerology" and "qabalistic correspondences" as if his knowledge has become a burden. He can't see the patterns because he's looking at too much stuff. His paranoia has made every piece of information important, which would make him a really bad detective actually. He has to weed out the irrelevant stuff, and he seems incapable of doing that. It's Jezebel Jet who cuts to the heart of the matter: "what if it's you?" she asks, in half-conern, half-fear. All Batman can do is walk away, implying that he knows it might be true.

Pages 18-19: The trigger word, "Zur-En-Arrh" appears on the screen, but all Batman can see is "static." Then the images on the screen are replaced by the face of the alien from Batman #156, which was part of Dr. Hurt's sensory deprivation experiment--the experiment which caused Batman to lose the ability to distinguish hallucination from reality.

Pages 20-22: Is Batman having a stroke? That's how I read it--apparently caused by the trigger word. Le Bossu says "La Bas" in reference to Alfred--meaning "the lower depths" or "deep," implying that they have been looking for him, looking to beat him or kill him. It could also be a reference to Alfred being "deep" undercover, although the final splash page makes it seem as if Alfred's life is in jeopardy. He may not be involved with the Black Glove after all.

Sunday, June 01, 2008

Summer Appearances

It looks like I'm going to have a pretty busy summer in 2008, hitting most of the comic book hot spots. If you're going to be at any of the following conventions or shows, keep an eye out for me and say "hi." Or, if you want to meet up, send me an e-mail (you can click the link in my profile) and we'll arrange something.

Here's where I'll be this summer:

JUNE 7th: MoCCA Art Fest (hanging out, buying some cool comics from probably 12:00-4:00)

JULY 24th-27th: San Diego Comic-Con (trying my best to avoid any and all lines, visiting with some of my favorite creators, and writing a bit about the show for CBR)

AUGUST 2nd-30th: Art of Joe Staton Exhbit (curated by MoCCA founder Lawrence Klein, and programmed by yours truly, I'll be around for most of the events that month, and I'll be teaching a course for kids on how to create their own superheroes--you should all make the trip up to Pittsfield, MA to check out the exhibit and hang out with all the cool people involved)

SEPTEMBER 27th-28th: Baltimore Comic-Con (we plan on having a booth to sell our newly revised copies of Grant Morrison: The Early Years and Teenagers from the Future, and I'll be on hand to sign copies and draw M.O.D.O.C.T.O.P.U.S. sketches for you)

I'll see you there!

Marvel 1985 #1 Review

Recently reviewed by me at CBR: Marvel 1985, Mark Millar's high-concept, long-delayed, formerly-fumetti series, about which I write the following sentences: "The setting is 1985 for a reason: not only was it a more innocent time, for all of us 30-something comic book readers, and for the Marvel Universe as well, but it was also the age of Spielberg -- that cultural moment when 'E.T.' and 'Indiana Jones' were the pinnacle of family entertainment. Millar's "1985" is very much like an 80s Spielberg film: it's Elliott from 'E.T.' meets Kurt Busiek and Alex Ross's 'Marvels.' And it works, almost completely."

I liked it a lot, actually.

Read the entire review HERE.

Giant-Size Astonishing X-Men #1 Review

Recently reviewed by me at CBR: Giant-Size Astonishing X-Men #1, about which I write the following sentence: "Although 'Astonishing X-Men' might have a long shelf life as a collected edition -- and it probably will -- as a serialized story it was a failure."

Read the entire review HERE.

Saturday, May 31, 2008

Final Crisis #1 Hits THE SLASH PAGE

Last summer I expressed my annoyance at the announcement of Jim Starlin's The Death of the New Gods. I said to Chris Marshall, of Collected Comics Libarary fame, that the only good that could possibly come of Starlin's series was a chance for Grant Morrison to revamp the New Gods in whatever crossover series he reportedly was working on. This was well before any Final Crisis details were announced--even the title was still a secret back then. But I hoped he would somehow resurrect the New Gods in the major 2008 event. Now, here we are, Chad Nevett and I, looking at the first issue of Final Crisis. Does it live up to my expectations? Does Chad's roommate love it as much as he does? Are you an idiot if you don't read it yourself?

All these questions and more may or may not be indirectly discussed in the newest installment of the internet's longest-running Chad and Tim discussion column: The Splash Page.

So go forth. Read our commentary. Click here.

Friday, May 30, 2008

Batman #677 Review

Recently reviewed by me at CBR: Batman #677, about which I write the following sentences: "Morrison's 'Batman' has re-engaged my interest in the Batman mythos, and I'm eager to see how he's going to tie the Black Glove reveal into the 'death' of Batman. Because even though I've been 'sure' of the Black Glove's identity about half a dozen times, I really don't know what Morrison has planned."

Read the entire review HERE.

Final Crisis #1 Review

Recently reviewed by me at CBR: Final Crisis #1, about which I write the following sentences: "This isn't just a giant team-up series. It's not a billion heroes from the DC Universe getting together to punch some shadowy bad guys or stop an alien invasion. This is the story of a planet, a universe, coming apart at the seams. It may not really be the "final" crisis, but the first issue makes it feel like it could be."

Read the entire review HERE.

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

The Superman 2000 Pitch: The Concept

In 1998, Grant Morrison, Mark Waid, Mark Millar, and Tom Peyer pitched something called "Superman 2000: A plan to revitalize the Superman franchise for the newmillenium." The pitch was rejected, for mysterious reasons, although Mark Waid discussed why he was forbidden from writing Superman in a 9/29/2000 interview with Warren Ellis:
WARREN ELLIS: I've been given to understand that when you and Morrison were turned down in your bid to take over SUPERMAN, you were informed that, in fact, you would NEVER be allowed to write the Superman books. What did that mean to you personally? What is the condition of your relationship with DC and Paul Levitz following it?

MARK WAID: What did that mean to me personally? You cannot IMAGINE the frustration. No, I mean it. You think you can, but you can't. The one job I'd been working towards my entire life--and I'd just been told point-blank that not only could I never have it, but I couldn't have it for any reasons that were just or made any logical sense--at least in part because someone at DC had point-blank asked me for a proposal and then failed to speak up when another someone decided I was simply crusading for a job that wasn't available, violating the freelance code, and acting in bad (and punishable) faith. Doesn't matter that that wasn't true; since when do truth and politics go hand in hand? Welcome to the real world.



Presumably the zeal with which Waid and the others pursued the job of revamping Superman caused such friction that the proposal was summarily rejected, even though it was filled with great ideas (some of which Morrison has since used or altered for his current All-Star Superman series). But as Waid points out in the interview, this was a pitch that was requested by DC editorial, and not just an example of freelance gunslinging.

According to the pitch, the proposed revamp was intended to, "honor each of Superman’s various interpretations and to use internal story logic as our launching pad for a re-imagined, streamlined 21st century Man of Steel. The 'cosmic reset' notion has been replaced by a policy of 'include and transcend' with regard to past continuity." "Include and transcend" has been a hallmark of Morrison's approach to superhero work--just look at his current Batman run where all of Batman's past adventures are considered part of the character's psychic background--and it's almost exactly what he's doing in All-Star Superman right now. If accepted, the "Superman 2000" idea would have been an all-inclusive continuity embrace, instead of a traditional "white-event" reboot (as we've seen repeatedly in The Legion of Super-Heroes--although perhaps Geoff Johns's "Legion of Three Worlds" is an example of the "include and transcend" philosophy, or at least the "include" part. Whatever the reason, the Morrison/Waid/Millar/Peyer Superman was never meant to be, and it's too bad, because it could have possibly made the mainstream Superman titles more interesting and important than they had been in years.

Here's a small example of the type of approach the "Superman 2000" team would have used, taken from the section of the pitch labeled "The Concept":
The key to the initial concept lies in a radical but organic reversal of the currently accepted logic of the Superman/Clark dynamic.

In our interpretation, Clark Kent isn’t what Superman really IS, Clark is what Superman WAS--until he reached his teenage years and began to realize what all those years of soaking up the Kansas sun had done to his alien cells. Superman’s story here is seen as the tale of a Midwest farmer’s son who BECAME AN ALIEN shortly after puberty. Suddenly young Clark doesn’t just know his Ma and Pa through sight, touch, sound--he knows the exact timbre of their pulse rates, he can look at their DNA and recognize their distinctive electrical fields and hear the neural crackle and release of chemicals which tell him they’ve changed their minds about something.

And he can do all this, he can scan the entire environment in an INSTANT, with levels of perception we can only imagine.

That’s gonna turn anyone’s head around a little.

This is someone who by any stretch of the imagination is no longer just human--except for the part of him, the ethical, humanitarian base nurtured by the Kents, which forms the unshakable foundation for everything Superman is BUT WHO IS WHAT SUPERMAN CAN NO LONGER BE. Or, in other words not our own, "...who, DISGUISED as Clark Kent, fights a never-ending battle..."

As originally conceived by Siegel and Shuster, Clark becomes a cherished, poignant masquerade: mild-mannered, thoughtful, humane Clark. When Superman is being human, Clark is his template but this is a being no longer confined by gravity or pain or mortality and his experiences as Superman are experiences on a level of existence we can only hope to imagine.

So, in order to accomplish the transition to this new take on Superman more easily, our rationale is this: it’s been established that Superman’s powers are a result of solar energy saturating his cellular batteries. It’s even been suggested that his powers will increase through time as he absorbs more of our sun’s radiation.

And that’s just what happens.

As part of his alien maturation process, Superman crosses a second, critical threshold of solar radiation absorption and suddenly wakes up three times more powerful and three times smarter.

This changes everything.

Not a radical change of the status quo, but an interesting enough approach, isn't it? It wasn't just about making Superman more powerful, it was about making Superman more aware. Transcendent.

UPDATE: Chad Nevett just posted a different bit from the "Superman 2000" pitch over on his blog. Read what he has to say about a Vegetarian Superman HERE.

Recent Comics I Have Read Part II: More Quick Reviews

Here's where I talk about some other comics I read over the past two weeks. Because I like comics, and so do you.

JUSTICE LEAGUE OF AMERICA #21: "Sightings"! That's DC's way of saying, "we're sorry about making everything tie into Countdown, because that was a really crappy story, wasn't it? To make it up to you, we'll just kind of sort of vaguely let you know that you may or may not want to buy this here comic because it might possibly relate to our big Final Crisis event, or whatever. We're totally cool either way. But if you're into it, you might want to check it out. No pressure. Seriously. But, it is kind of important, actually." Luckily, DC, I'm really into you, and you had me at "Crisis." But, is this comic worth your $2.99? Yes it is, because it has many panels featuring a guy who can shoot flames from his nipples AND has a moustache. ***1/2

JUSTICE SOCIETY OF AMERICA #15: The debut of Big Gog. I'm often a Geoff Johns apologist/supporter/activist, but I think this series is his weakest work in years. He doesn't seem able to do anything with his gigantic cast (oh shit, that doesn't bode well for Legion of Three Worlds, does it?), and it's just a lot of continuity wankery and legacy characters that just sit around and I want it to be better than it is. Please, Geoff Johns, save this series by pruning it down, and amping up the conflict. Big Gog is perhaps a start in the right direction, since he's, you know, bigger than the old, regular-sized Gog. **

NEWUNIVERSAL SHOCKFRONT #1: Warren Ellis has made the New Universe interesting, but he still hasn't really kicked off any sort of plot yet. The first series was all set-up, and here we are again, setting things up. The dominoes are in position, Warren. Kick em hard. Starting, now! Really, anytime you're ready. Go! (Warren? Hello?) **1/2

SECRET INVASION FANTASTIC FOUR #1: I liked Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa's characterizations in the Marvel Knight's 4 series, but the premise of that book was so ridiculous--the broke FF get "regular" jobs to pay the bills? Um, they're kind of a big deal--that I couldn't really enjoy what he was doing with the characters themselves. So I'm glad to see him doing something that's based on superheroic hinjinx. Plus, I like Secret Invasion a lot so far, and if you don't like it then you are too jaded to enjoy anything. So too bad for you. As for this actual comic, it's okay. Barry Kitson's Sue Storm is nice. **1/2

SOLEIL SKY DOLL #1: I didn't buy this, because I've already read the whole series when it was reprinted in Heavy Metal a few years ago. By the way, it's not actually very good. It's a typical sleazy religious satire with a lot of sex--pretty much what you'd expect from Heavy Metal. I like the art, but the story has thinly-veiled allegory and plenty of low humor. I don't recommend buying the single issues, but it might be worth a look if the collected edition is under $10. Which it won't be. *1/2

SUPERMAN BATMAN #48: Shane Davis is by far the best of the Jim Lee clones DC is so fond of. He should be doing Morrison's Batman. That would be a nice fit for his style. (Then Geoff Klock would get even more fodder for his Miller/Morrison one-upmanship theory.) Meanwhile, this current story arc, which began approximately twelve years ago by my recollection, is all about Superman gathering all the kryptonite on the planet, blah, blah, and then in this issue: Kryptonite Doomsday! Except, it's actually a simple-minded American soldier transformed into an exact replica of Doomsday, but with KRYPTONITE KNUCKLES. What bad luck for Superman! Even though Supes can't weaken the KRYPTONITE FISTS, he can weaken the human heart. With love. God bless you, Superman (and Batman). **1/2

THUNDERBOLTS #120: What kind of schedule is this series on? I don't remember the last Warren Ellis-written issue of this comic, but this one was a doozy. Green Goblin is crazy, did you know that? He has a bit of a history, and he probably wasn't the best choice for a governmental official. I hate, hate, hate the Tommy Lee Jones look of Norman Osborn (especially since Dum Dum Dugan is ALSO Tommy Lee Jones over in the Iron Man comic). But Warren Ellis writes the greatest crazy-person dialogue maybe ever, and when I go back an reread his run on this series--which will probably never happen, let's face it--I'll surely find that he's been telling a Norman Osborn story all along. ***1/2

TINY TITANS #4: Disco Nightwing premieres. My kids loved this issue, even though they know nothing about Nightwing's original costume or disco. Also in this issue: The Little Tiny Titans: Miss Martian, Jericho, Wildebeest, and Kid Devil. They are cute and precocious. Art Baltazar remains one of my favorite cartoonists, and this series is for everyone who has the heart and mind of a small child. Therefore, I adore it. It's better than a KRYPTONITE PUNCH to the face. ***1/2

TWELVE #5: I'm only buying this for the Chris Weston art, really--and the concept, since I'm a sucker for obscure old heroes (although not so much of a sucker as to find Dynamite's Superpowers enjoyable). Maybe the whole thing will add up to a good story, but right now I'm just looking at all the detail in each panel and thinking: how does he draw comics as quickly as he does? He is good at making lots of little lines. ***

WAR IS HELL: FIRST FLIGHT PHANTOM EAGLE #3: This is a bit lighter than Garth Ennis's usual wartime stuff, and it doesn't have the ridiculous excesses of his Preacher or The Boys, but it's a cynical little dagger of an "origin story." The stiff-upper-lip mentality and gung-ho heroics are mocked, and the protagonist keeps stumbling into good fortune, and it's all illustrated by the incomparable Howard Chaykin in what's probably his best Marvel work so far. It's almost as if Ennis and Chaykin collaborated on a revamp of a goofy, obscure character. Oh, wait, that's exactly what it is, and that's good time for me. ***1/2

WOLVERINE #65: Here's a little tidbit from the secret files of Jason Aaron: he wasn't allowed to have Wolverine use his claws in the scenes set in the past. Apparently, Marvel editorial has a "no-claws" policy for Wolverine flashbacks, except for "Origin," in which his claws appear. So the official stance is: claws at first, no claws for a couple hundred years, then claws again in the present. Does that affect this final part of "Get Mystique"? Nope, but I wanted to share the knowledge with the world. This comic has been good with Aaron and Ron Garney, and I'm glad to see that Aaron will get another shot at the character after Millar runs him through the futuristic wringer (will he have claws in the future? One assumes so). A good conclusion to a good story. ***1/2

WONDER WOMAN #20: This book is completely on track, finally. If you've been waiting for it to settle into a groove of goodness, I think now's the time to safely jump on. Gail Simone's version of Wonder Woman is 90% warrior, 10% "stranger in a strange land," and I think that formula works for the character. It's worth a read. ***

X-MEN ORIGIN COLOSSUS:
Wow, this expensive little one-shot was a waste of money. I bought it because Trevor Hairsine's art, which is quite nice (and somewhat rare, since he's super-slow), but what you get for your four bucks is the same old Colossus origin story we all know--he's from Russia and he turns into metal--and...that's it. No additional subtext, no new perspective on his early days. Just a slow-moving recap presented at the rapid pace of a Henry James novel. Here's my new rule for these kinds of stories: tell them from a fresh perspective, or don't tell them at all. Thanks. *1/2

This Thursday is the greatest day of comic book awesomery this year, though, so I'm sure at one of the cool comics this week is bound will wipe away all of my bad thoughts.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Recent Comics I Have Read Part I: Some Quick Reviews

Here is Part I of my two-part attempt to talk about comics I've read in the past two weeks that didn't warrant full CBR reviews. In other words, I could have gotten paid to do this in more detail, but you get the short, flimsy commentary for free:

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #559-#560: Dan Slott has the perfect tone for Spider-Man, and although I still don't love the stories from Brand New Day, I enjoy them enough to keep buying this series. And, yes, I still love the swiftness of it all. An arc completed each month is just a brilliant move, and it keeps this series near the top of my stack every Wednesday. Also, on this recent arc, Marcos Martin does the art, and his version of Spider-Man and the New York skyline is possibly my favorite of all the Brand New Day artists so far, including Chris Bachalo. This is some pretty stuff, and it's silly as hell, but a lot of fun. Just like this series should be. ***1/2

AVENGERS INITIATIVE #13: I almost dropped this series after the first extended arc concluded in issue #12. This issue brings a new group of recruits to the training center, and I'm glad I bought it. I think Steve Uy's art borders on the mannequin-esque, and I'm not a fan of his layouts either, but Slott took this issue in a different direction than the previous 12 by focusing on one of the most pathetic and annoying superheroes ever. I kind of hate the art enough to make me stop buying this series, but I think I'll stick around for a few more issues to see what happens with the rest of the new recruits, most of whom are villains conscripted into service for the Initiative. **1/2

BLACK PANTHER #36: I'm just biding my time until Jason Aaron does his arc, and then I'm done with this disappointing series. *1/2

BOOSTER GOLD #9: Eh, I'm ambivalent about this comic. I love that this series has become a strange tour through alternate futures (or presents, or whatever), instead of just touring through DC's past, but I'm already sick of Maxwell Lord in all of his temporal incarnations. However, I like the evil time travellers, and I'm curious to see what Johns has in mind for them--these are the guys who premiered back in the "Lightning Saga" last summer, and if you've wondered why that subplot never payed off, well, it's because those guys are appearing here. I can't imagine that was the original plan. "Hey," thought Geoff Johns, "I'll set up some cool villains in the midst of a huge Legion/JLA/JSA crossover and then not use them for a year until I throw them into a Booster Gold story." But, that's what has happened. **1/2

BRAVE AND THE BOLD #13: I'm trying to remember what happened in this issue, and I can't. I know Jay Garrick was involved. I'm loving the Jerry Ordway art, I know that--even more that Perez's work (weird, I know, but Ordway grounds things physically so very well)--but I can't remember a single event or line of dialogue from this story. That tells me I'm reading too many comics, but it also tells me that this series is missing something if it's that forgettable. Sure, I'll blame Waid for my poor reading skills. *** (for the art)

CAPTAIN AMERICA #38: Ah, the Cold War Captain America. Nice. What a perfect foil for Bucky (aka the Winter Soldier aka Captain America with the gun). Ed Brubaker is still telling the story he began back in issue #1 and he's one of the few writers using the serialized nature of mainstream comics to his advantage. This series will probably be a great read when it's all collected, but it's fun to read in small doses too. I like this book a lot. ****

CATWOMAN #79: I'd love to see the Lopez brothers take over the art on a big, important book. These guys have produced years and years of top-notch work on Catwoman and I'd buy their version of the Justice League or Superman. They are somewhere in the middle between Kevin Maguire and Cameron Stewart. Good stuff, consistently, with personality. This series has been good ever since Pfeifer has taken over, and I hope he gets a shot at a big book too. Amazons Attack was an aberration. He knows how to writer, and I'll buy anything he works on next. Oh, yeah, this issue was good. ***

DC SPECIAL CYBORG #1 (OF 5): Did anyone buy this? I like Mark Sable's work. His Grounded book was fantastic--everything the X-Men could be if handled by someone interested in characterization. I'm rooting for him to get more mainstream work, and he has a Two Face: Year One series coming out soon that I'll check out. But Ken Lashley drew this Cyborg book, and I think he's one of the weakest artists working at DC today. So I skipped this. Did I miss anything?

FLASH #240: Tom Peyer seems like a nice guy. I've liked some of his work in the 1990s. I don't like his Flash at all. He makes Gorilla Grodd seem dull, even. This series is probably just treading water until it gets relaunched as a Barry Allen series with...I'm guessing Geoff Johns and...Ethan Van Sciver? Nah, he's too slow for a monthly. Hmm, maybe Carlos Pecheco? Yeah, Johns and Pacheco. Flash, 2009. *

GHOST RIDER #23: Danny Ketch is back! I don't know if that's important, because all I know is that he used to be Ghost Rider and he has some kind of futuristic skull bike to battle Johnny Blaze's classic chopper. Is Jason Aaron a great writer? Yes, he is. Is this a cool horror-action book? Yup. You should buy it. It's the greatest angel-of-vengeance on a motorcycle vs. cannibals and naughty nurses and God's secret black ops division comic ever. ****

GREEN ARROW BLACK CANARY #8: Cliff Chiang, we miss you. Mike Norton is an excellent artist, though, and I'll probably keep buying this because I'm enjoying the romp around the globe plotline. It's on the verge of getting cut, but I'll stick around at least until issue #10. Judd Winick, you have two issues to make greatness happen. **1/2

GUARDIANS OF GALAXY #1: This is a pretty cool collection of Marvel's strange space characters, and I'd like the book a lot more if everyone didn't talk like they were on a sitcom with a laugh track. (None of the characters talked this way in any of the Annihilation series, but now they're all Charlie Sheen all of a sudden.) **1/2

IRON MAN DIRECTOR OF SHIELD #29: I have only read a couple of issues of this series because (a) Iron Man seemed like a simplistic character, and (b) he's kind of a dick, and not in good way, and (c) the story arcs seemed draaaaaggged out forever. But I, like many Americans, watched the Iron Man movie and all of a sudden wanted to buy new bed sheets with the armored Avenger splashed all over them. Since my wife wouldn't have any of it--she must be waiting for the Speed Racer linens to go on clearance--I've been picking up Iron Man comics instead. I hated the Favreau thing, loved the Fraction thing, and since this sucker was on the shelf this week, I bought it. It's okay. Too much chit chat about tactics and stuff I don't care about, and not much story, but it scratched my Iron Man itch for the week. My son, also with the same itch, wanted me to read this to him at bedtime. I did. It's not a fun comic to read aloud. Imagine reading an operator's manual aloud, but with a few more explosions. **1/2

Monday, May 26, 2008

My Daughter, a Four-Year-Old Indiana Jones Expert

My daughter really likes the first three Indiana Jones movies, and she talks about them all the time. Here's her summary of all three original movies, in less than four minutes.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Morrison on R.I.P. and Beyond

IGN posted a pretty extensive interview with Grant Morrison the other day, and it's full of great nuggets like:
Morrison: The scripts are very detailed, as are the descriptions. But things go wrong. Like in the first issue of Batman RIP, the Joker wasn't supposed to have any blood on him at the end, because he's in an asylum cell having just had a fantasy that he projected on a Rorschach blot card. And the colorist didn't quite get it, so there's blood all over the place, [laughs] and a lot of people didn't understand that scene. Which is quite a simple scene, but a scene that people went online trying to explain in some of the most outlandish ways. But it was a coloring error. There shouldn't have been blood. It should have just been the Joker having a fantasy. The doctor shows the card to Joker, the Joker's sitting in his cell and he suddenly realizes that something interesting is up.
That coloring error completely changes the meaning of the scene, obviously. I interpreted it to mean that Joker killed the doctor (because what else could have possibly caused the blood), but apparently not. This color mistake points out the problems with authorial intent. When the writer is not the artist, the meaning of a work changes, and which is the "correct" meaning: the intended one never printed or the interpretation of the printed story?

Here's what Morrison goes on to say about the Black Glove:
There's a kind of pyramid of influence. At the bottom you have the Club of Villains who are working with the Black Glove. Then you have the Black Glove organization, which is a group of very wealthy people who we meet in the upcoming issue. And then above that you have the identity of the Black Glove, who is a person.
That explains the confusion about whether or not the Black Glove is an organization. Pretty much matches what I suspected.

When asked where fans should go back to his previous issues and look for clues, Morrison says,
Oh God – you've got to look at a few of them. I think you should definitely look at the three-parter where Batman is in the chamber, the torture story. That one's got some major stuff in it. The Club of Heroes has a lot of stuff in it. Pretty much everything. [laughs] I want everyone to go back and buy all of them. It all ties in. The difficult thing has been to try and lay red herrings, because to me the answer is so obvious that hiding it has been the real challenge.
If the answer--and by answer, I assume he means the identity of the Black Glove--is obvious, maybe it is Alfred or Bruce Wayne himself. Or maybe not.

An interesting interview, no? He goes on to talk a bit about Final Crisis and his plans to stick with Batman for yet another long story after "Batman R.I.P." You can read the whole interview starting here.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Fantastic Four #557 Hits THE SPLASH PAGE

I didn't feel like posting another image of Fantastic Four #557 here, since I just posted it along with a link to my CBR review. So here's FF #57 for your eye-pleasing delight. Giant Dr. Doom heads, surfing aliens, Wyatt Wingfoot?!? Now that's the Fantastic Four. So the question is: how good is this new Mark Millar/Bryan Hitch version? Why does Chad Nevett hate it so much? Why do I defend it? Does the final issue of the "Nu-World" story arc make any kind of sense? Are giant robots enough to make something friggin' awesome?

All of these questions and more, answered in the newest installment of THE SPLASH PAGE.

Sometimes people don't like clicking on the words, "The Splash Page." Maybe it's the ALL-CAPS scaring them away. If you're one of those people, you can read what Chad and I have to say about FF #557 by clicking here.